Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2 sets
#4
(02-02-2019, 07:53 PM)Stewilliams Wrote: Personally I would take the first set 1 or 2 reps short of failure and then use the same weight for the next set and take it to failure. This is assuming that there isn't a back width exercise in between the 2 sets. If there was then I would likely lighten the load for the second set.
[/quo


so how do I know its time to make progress or add weight on that exercise load set( barbell row) if I never take myself to failure??


[quote='Scott Stevenson' pid='20442' dateline='1548941679']

What would be the reasons for doing it that way, versus another way (say, boing lighter for the same number of reps, or even closer to 12 reps)?...

-S


isn't the goal to get stronger. bigger???

so 2 sets of 315 for 10-12 rps short of failure will actually induce more growth than 1 set of 315 x 10 and 1 of 365 x 8??
Reply


Messages In This Thread
2 sets - by OLYMPIAN - 01-31-2019, 11:52 AM
RE: 2 sets - by Scott Stevenson - 01-31-2019, 11:34 PM
RE: 2 sets - by Stewilliams - 02-02-2019, 07:53 PM
RE: 2 sets - by OLYMPIAN - 02-03-2019, 02:47 AM
RE: 2 sets - by Scott Stevenson - 02-03-2019, 11:46 PM
RE: 2 sets - by Stewilliams - 02-04-2019, 12:51 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)