Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Full body workout is the new split.
#1


I've been pushing high frequency full body since 2000, when I read Brian Haycock and modified HST.
After some researches and personal experiences, I changed some HST variables: specifically, I increased volume and frequency and used some rest pause techniques.
Some years ago, I read Scott Stevenson's book/ideas and I said "shit, I was right!".

I talked with Eric helms, Jeff nipped, Mike Israetel about my methodology...Their replies were always the same "it is too much" "you can train your entire body because, after some sets, performance will suffer" "you can't train a muscle everyday because the muscle has not recovered yet (!)".
I hoped these guys were going to change their minds and said "maybe Brian and Scott are right.."
Now all of them are pushing for full body training. Full body is the new split: an "on style" training method.

Ok, it is on style but it is old style too!
Call it vintage training!

Now, the bad part.
They changed their mind but they are not paying any tribute to Brian or Scott or...Arthur jones. Because that man had no scientific background but was a fucking intuitive genius!
It is embarrassing how these guys recycle old ideas but do not say anything about the story behind "their" ideas. It makes me crazy!
We know bodybuilding is a business and if you are trying to make money, one of the strategies is showing you invented something new.
But I can't tolerate this unethical attitude: this is stealing ideas.
[-] The following 1 user says Thank You to duchaine for this post:
  • Stewilliams
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Full body workout is the new split. - by duchaine - 07-21-2019, 09:16 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)