Login

**Scott Stevenson** · (This post was last modified: 09-04-2014, 11:32 PM by Scott Stevenson.)

melvininaz · 05-05-2012, 01:36 AM

Informative, easy-to-read article. Just what I asked the other day right there in print! Thanks... biggrin

**Scott Stevenson** · 05-15-2012, 12:52 PM

Test Reply....

Assigned to...

JLarge1989 · 03-19-2014, 04:37 AM

Can't seem to be able to download it?

**Scott Stevenson** · 03-19-2014, 05:21 AM

(03-19-2014, 04:37 AM)JLarge1989 Wrote: Can't seem to be able to download it?

http://www.scottstevensonphd.com/336ripp...-10-18.pdf

JLarge1989 · 03-19-2014, 05:22 AM

Done it....so basically weight training is generally a better method to burn more calories as calories are still burned for a long period even after finishing training

**Scott Stevenson** · 03-19-2014, 09:29 AM

(03-19-2014, 05:22 AM)JLarge1989 Wrote: Done it....so basically weight training is generally a better method to burn more calories as calories are still burned for a long period even after finishing training

Not exactly.

BALLS to the WALL weight training: Muscle sets of large muscle mass, compound exercises like squats, cleans and benches (and reads) will have that effect. The way most gym goers do it…. not so much. (Check the table in there…)

The protocol in the Scheunke study was 4 sets each of squats, cleans and benches to failure in the ~10RM range, with like 2:00 rest. Going from memory here. Just 4 sets of squats to failure in 10 min. will kick most folks asses. Smile

-S

carnera · 01-21-2017, 12:49 AM

Very good articles, TY Scott.

**Scott Stevenson** · 01-21-2017, 12:55 AM

(01-21-2017, 12:49 AM)carnera Wrote: Very good articles, TY Scott.

You're welcome!

-S

Login
Username:
Password:	Lost Password?
	Remember me